Sigma
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
around $799

Sigma
around $799
359 Pros
78%
27 reviews (3h 47m)
103 Cons
1:1 macro for full-frame mirrorless, sharp and lightweight....
87%
106 vs 16
93%
62 vs 5
92%
65 vs 6
48%
43 vs 47
74%
20 vs 7
Across 27 YouTube reviews, the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art earns an Index score of 4.1/5, ranking #3 among Lenses. Reviewers most often praise its build quality, focal length/range, image quality, while the most common criticisms concern autofocus, build quality.
Reviewers universally praise the Sigma 105mm for its exceptional, razor-sharp optical quality, a hallmark of the Art series. This lens provides true 1:1 macro magnification, rendering incredible detail in close-up subjects, while also serving as a fantastic medium telephoto lens for portraiture, delivering beautiful, creamy bokeh and great subject separation. Its versatility is complemented by a premium, weather-sealed build and a wealth of physical controls, including a de-clickable aperture ring, a multi-stage focus limiter, and a customizable button. For its impressive performance and robust feature set, the lens is frequently cited as an excellent value, offering a compelling alternative to more expensive first-party options.
The most significant drawback is the lack of in-lens optical stabilization, making handheld macro photography challenging as even camera-body IBIS is less effective at close distances. While the autofocus is generally accurate, reviewers note it can be slow, audibly noisy, and prone to hunting, especially in low light or when covering its full focus range. This makes it less than ideal for video shooters using on-camera microphones. The focus-by-wire manual focus ring also drew criticism for feeling less precise and tactile than competing lenses with mechanical clutch systems, and some noted significant focus breathing.
Analysis based on 27 YouTube reviews (3h 47m of video) with 359 pros and 103 cons extracted.
Based on 27 independent YouTube reviews, the Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art scores 4.1/5 with 359 positive and 103 negative points mentioned by reviewers, placing it #3 in the Lenses category.
The most praised aspects are build quality, focal length/range, image quality — Build Quality (106 mentions), Focal Length/Range (65 mentions), Image Quality (62 mentions).
Reviewers most frequently criticize autofocus, build quality — Autofocus (47 mentions), Build Quality (16 mentions).
Spotted an error? Help me improve by reporting it!
Find this helpful? Please consider a donation!
☕Buy me a coffee